About FINCAD

With deep market understanding, a client-centered business approach, and unmatched engineering expertise, FINCAD is uniquely positioned to lead the market in enterprise risk and valuation technology.

Connecting the SOFR Curve to SOFR Swaps

In my last blog, I wrote about my experience with building the SOFR curve. Now FINCAD F3 can handle any instrument market data for curve building. But at the moment an important question is, “Which instruments are the right ones to use to build the SOFR curve?

Right now, the market for SOFR-linked derivatives is just starting to take shape, and market quotes are becoming available for CME SOFR futures and SOFR swaps. There are three types of swaps that are being traded: SOFR OIS, SOFR-FF basis swaps, and SOFR-Libor basis swaps. The first one is an overnight indexed swap which pays SOFR versus fixed, and the last two are basis swaps between SOFR and either the Fed Funds effective rate (FF) or Libor. 

The odd thing about introducing SOFR as an alternative benchmark interest rate is that, for now, it makes the USD rate basis much more complicated. This is because it adds two new basis spreads between FF/SOFR and Libor/SOFR, in addition to the previous FF/Libor basis. So now there are many possible ways to build the SOFR curve. These include: 

Single curve-building:

  1. Use FF OIS to build the Fed Funds effective rate curve.
  2. Use ED futures and Libor swaps to build the 3-month Libor curve.
  3. Use SOFR futures and either SOFR OIS, FF/SOFR basis, or Libor/SOFR basis to build the SOFR curve.

Global curve-building:

  1. Use ED futures, Libor swaps, FF OIS, FF/Libor basis swaps, SOFR futures, and either SOFR OIS, FF/SOFR basis, or Libor/SOFR basis to simultaneously build the 3-month Libor curve, Fed Funds effective rate curve, and SOFR curve.

For many people, their instinct would be that building the curves individually is the easiest. However, the dual dependence of the FF OIS and FF/SOFR basis swaps on the OIS discount and SOFR curves creates a curve construction problem, which necessitates a global solver.

As mentioned in my previous post, I chose to use the global method, because it is actually easier to just let F3 automatically determine how to solve the curves from the instruments selected. This approach also allows using the FF/Libor basis for longer maturities, since often the Fed Funds OIS is not as liquid. But there is still a big question here, “Which SOFR instruments should we choose?”

Imagine swapping Fed Funds into Libor and then swapping Libor exposure into SOFR. Now compare this with swapping Fed Funds into SOFR directly. The question about the new SOFR basis is, “Does it roundtrip so we get the same SOFR in both cases?” The answer right now is that there is not enough trading on SOFR derivatives to closely round-trip these two ways of swapping Fed Funds into SOFR. The symptom of SOFR illiquidity is large bid-ask spreads in the market quotes for basis swaps on SOFR, so that by using mid-quotes as market data, the SOFR curve will look a little different in the two cases.

A recent summary of SOFR swap trading volumes shows that there is a lot of uncertainty regarding where the volume will show up in SOFR-linked derivatives. It is expected that they will become traded more as time goes on, and competitive markets will result in smaller bid-ask spreads. But we don’t know which swaps will be the best to build the SOFR curve. Surely with Libor going away we shouldn’t rely too much on Libor/SOFR basis swaps, but whether the future will show volumes in the FF/SOFR basis or SOFR OIS is unknown. This is another good reason to have a global curve-building solution which can handle any and all instruments you throw at it. Such an approach will help you react quickly to changes in trading volume in SOFR derivatives to continue building the most accurate SOFR curve possible.

In case you missed it, you can check out my previous SOFR blog post here, “Building a SOFR Curve was Easy.” Also, be on the lookout for my next post, “Eliminating the SOFR Basis: What Do We Lose?” 
 

About the author

Bin Hou

Senior Financial Engineer, FINCAD

Bin is a member of the Financial Engineering Hub in Vancouver. Since he joined FINCAD in 2013, Bin has made contributions to FINCAD products through conducting model validations and encoding the best market practice in examples and documents.

Bin holds a Master of Science in Finance degree from Simon Fraser University. He is also a CFA® and FRM® charterholder.
 

Video

F3 Video

The next generation of powerful valuation and risk solutions is here.

Brochure

F3 Brochure

Portfolio valuation and risk analytics for multi-asset derivatives and fixed income.

Subscribe to our Blog

Don't miss a post. Get every blog post in your inbox.